* Required Items







Tell us about your case.

WHK Partners Receive Recognition as Alabama and Florida Superlawyers

WHK Fights for Justice on TV
See our commercials

Visit Our YouTube Channel

Ward vs. CSX Transportation, Inc
VERDICT - $34,558,333

Hutchens vs. CSX Transportation, Inc.
VERDICT - $2,000,000

Attorneys Specializing in Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) Cases Regarding Injuries In The Railroad Workplace 

FELA Injury Attorneys Serving Clients in Birmingham Alabama and Nationwide

During the second half of the 19th Century, American railroads expanded at an astonishing pace. On May 10, 1869, the first transcontinental railroad was completed with the joining of the Union Pacific and Central Pacific railroad tracks at Promontory Point, Utah. Over the next several decades, thousands of new rail lines were established throughout the United States. The rapid expansion of American railroads took an enormous toll in human suffering and misery. Working conditions on American railroads were obscenely dangerous. In one year, 1886, over 8,000 men lost their lives working for the railroads.

The life expectancy of a railroad brakeman was a mere seven years. Amputations and maiming were common place. To make matters worse, injured employees and the families of those killed on the job received nothing. There was no law at the time to provide compensation for on the job injuries. Congress had enough and decided the carnage must stop.

In 1908, the Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) was passed. It was the first law in this country that provided for compensation for workers injured on the job. The FELA is a simple law. It provides that any railroad employee injured as a result of the negligence of the railroad is entitled to recover from the railroad full compensation for his injuries. It was and is a fault based statute. In other words, to recover under the FELA, the injured worker must prove that the railroad was at fault or did something wrong.

During the early days of the FELA, the railroad was often able to avoid its responsibility to its injured employees by invoking a doctrine known as assumption of risk. Under this common law doctrine, an employee who was aware of the dangerous nature of railroad work was held to have assumed the risk of his employment and thus could not recover for his injuries. Fortunately, in 1939 Congress stepped in once again and amended the Federal Employers Liability Act  to eliminate the defense of assumption of risk.

In another victory for injured railroad workers, Congress provided in the Federal Employers Liability Act that the contributory negligence of the employee would not bar a recovery; rather, it would simply reduce the amount of the recovery. For example, if the railroad is found to have been 75% at fault for an injury, and the railroad worker himself is 25% at fault, then the railroad worker’s compensation will be reduced by 25%. The final ingredient which has made the FELA a powerful friend of the injured worker is the insistence of the United States Supreme Court that FELA cases must be decided by a jury.

The Supreme Court has held that if there is "any evidence, even the slightest" of negligence on the part of the railroad, then an injured employee’s case must be decided by a jury.

This right of jury determination has removed FELA cases from the hands of judges who were often in favor of the railroad and placed it firmly in the hands of American juries.

Wettermark Holland & Keith, LLC has extensive experience representing the victims of railroad accidents. They have a proven track record that shows experience and the ability to win cases. As FELA injury lawyers, the firm has relationships with dozens of doctors, specialists, and other health care professionals to assist its clients.

If you are looking for experience, reputation, and professionalism, contact us. The right lawyer can make a difference. Call Wettermark Holland & Keith, LLC.

Alabama Personal Injury Attorney | Tennessee Injury Lawyer | Wettermark Holland & Keith, LLC